Information & Specifications
|
|
Price & Availability
| Price: | € 2199.00 |
| Availability: | In Stock |
| Ships: | 14 business days |
|
|
Detailed Description
The design of the gun traces back to the early 1930s when Fedor Tokarev gave up his attempts to design a recoil-operated self-loading rifle, and concentrated on the gas operating principle. Stalin had a great interest in semi-automatic infantry rifles, and in 1935 a design competition was held, which was won by the rifle designed by Sergei Gavrilovich Simonov, and was accepted into service the next year as the AVS36. However, problems with the AVS quickly manifested, and another competition was held, to which both Tokarev and Simonov submitted their improved designs. This time, Tokarev`s rifle was chosen. The rifle was accepted for production under the designation SVT-38, and it was hoped to become the new standard issue rifle of the Red Army. Ambitious production plans were made: the production was planned to be increased to two million rifles per year by 1943. Production began in Tula at 1939.
The SVT-38 was a gas-operated weapon with a short-stroke, spring-loaded piston above the barrel and a tilting bolt, thus being one of the pioneers of this configuration which became widely used; there is some dispute about who exactly came up first with this operating principle, as the SVT`s mechanism considerably resembles Dieudonne Saive`s contemporary designs: Saive would eventually design the FN FAL, which employs the same operating principle as the SVT.
The SVT-38 was a very different rifle by Soviet and Russian standards of the day. Soviet small arms were generally of extremely simple and robust construction, designed for use by poorly educated and sometimes poorly equipped soldiers. The SVT-38 in contrast had been designed with weight savings in mind, in everything from its wooden stock to its metal receiver and action. Its gas-operated action was complex by Soviet standards, and ill-suited to handle the rigors of corrosive Soviet ammunition without frequent cleaning.
The SVT-38 was equipped with a bayonet and a 10-round detachable magazine. The receiver was open top, which enabled reloading of the magazine using five round Mosin-Nagant stripper clips. Normally, three magazines were issued with each rifle. Fairly advanced features for its time were the adjustable gas system, muzzle brake and scope rails milled into the receiver. The sniper variant had an additional locking notch for a see-through scope mount. The sniper version was equipped with a 3.5X PU scope, which was slightly shorter than the otherwise similar scope used on Mosin-Nagant sniper variants.
The SVT-38 saw its combat debut in the Winter War. The initial reaction of the troops to this new weapon was negative. Among the issues were that they felt the rifle was too long and cumbersome, difficult to maintain, and the magazines had a tendency to fall off. Some of these problems can be attributed to insufficient training and incorrect maintenance, but others were obviously the result of design flaws. Production of the SVT-38 was terminated in April 1940 after some 150,000 examples were manufactured. Subsequently an improved design, designated the SVT-40, entered production. It was a more refined, lighter design incorporating a modified magazine release. The handguard was now single-piece and the cleaning rod was housed under the barrel. Other changes were made in an effort to simplify manufacture. Production of this improved weapon began in July 1940 at Tula, and later at factories in Ishevsk and Kovrov. At the same time, production of the Mosin-Nagant M91/30 rifle was discontinued. As these factories already had experience manufacturing the SVT-38, production geared up quickly and an estimated 70,000 SVT-40s were produced in 1940.
By the time of German invasion in June 1941, the SVT-40 was already in widespread use in the Red Army. In a Soviet infantry division`s TO&E, one-third of rifles were supposed to be SVTs, although in practice this was seldom achieved. The first months of the war were disastrous for the Soviet Union, and hundreds of thousands of these rifles were lost. To make up for this enormous amount of lost weaponry, production of the Mosin-Nagant rifles was reintroduced. In contrast, the SVT was more difficult to manufacture, and troops with only rudimentary training had difficulty maintaining it. In addition, submachine guns like the PPSh-41 had proven their value as simple and cheap, but effective weapons to supplement infantry firepower. This all led to a gradual decline in SVT production. However, if German soldiers, with their initial lack of an amiable semi-automatic rifle, captured this weapon, they would usually prefer to use this instead of their own weapons. In 1941, over a million SVTs were produced, but in 1942 Ishevsk arsenal was ordered to cease SVT production and switch back to the Mosin-Nagant 91/30. Only 264,000 SVTs were manufactured in 1942 and production continued to diminish until the order to cease production was finally given in January 1945. Total production of the SVT-38/40 was probably around 1.6 million rifles, of which about 55,000 were the SVT-40 sniper variant.
In service, it was noted that the SVTs frequently suffered from vertical shot dispersion. For a sniper rifle, this was unacceptable and production of the specialised sniper variant of the SVT was terminated in 1942. At the same time, the milling of scope rails in the receivers of standard SVT rifles was discontinued. Other production changes included a new, simpler muzzle brake design. To supplement the Red Army`s shortage of machineguns, a version capable of automatic fire was produced in 1943, designated the AVT-40. It was externally similar to the SVT, but its safety also acted as a fire selector. A larger 15 or 20 round capacity magazine was reportedly designed for use with the AVT, but this is unconfirmed and there are no known examples. The AVT featured a slightly stouter stock; surplus AVT stocks were later used on refurbished SVTs. In service, the AVT proved to be a disappointment - automatic fire was largely uncontrollable, and the rifles often suffered breakages under the increased strain. The use of the AVT`s automatic fire mode was subsequently prohibited, and production of the AVT was relatively brief. A shorter carbine version (sometimes called SKT-40) was designed in 1940 and reportedly produced in small numbers, but again this is somewhat disputed. As a field modification, standard SVT`s were sometimes modified into a carbine configuration, with varying degrees of success and work quality. A prototype version chambered for the new, shorter M1943 round was developed, but not accepted for production.